Home / Building services / Shining the light on human responses to LEDs
Image CC credit Anita Hart

Shining the light on human responses to LEDs

A new report which looked at human responses to LED lighting has revealed that aside from efficiency and cost, human reactions to light sources should be a primary factor when deciding whether or not to deploy them.

Commissioned by the Society of Light and Lighting (SLL), part of the Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers (CIBSE), and produced by Public Health England, the report addresses the positive and negative effects of exposure to light from LED light sources.

The report found that LED solutions are valid energy efficient options in comparison to other available light sources, with stated performance that is generally accurate in comparison, and that none of the LEDs tested presented a risk of retinal damage when used correctly.

The findings also revealed that designers should consider the LED as part of the whole light fixture and the environment in which it is used to determine if it is suitable – a factor that is as important as the price of the LED or its efficiency. 

Cost was shown to have no significant impact on the flicker or colour rendering of the lamp, but there are potential issues surrounding LED lights which must be factored in when deciding where they should be used, and what kind of fixture is most appropriate for them.

For example, around half of domestic and office LEDs were found to have higher flicker rates than alternative sources. According to the report, this must be taken into account by designers, who should choose LEDs with lower flicker rates, or avoid using them in public places where they may contribute to adverse health symptoms in a very small number of those regularly exposed.  The report also advises those in procurement need to be very careful to include low flicker requirements in their specifications, and all specifiers need to be aware that if LED products are substituted by contractors or suppliers then flicker needs to be considered.

Similarly, other studies have shown that blue light can mimic daylight and confuse the brains of humans and animals into delaying melatonin production, potentially disrupting the sleep and the circadian cycle. The report concludes that designers should therefore avoid LEDs with a high Correlated Colour Temperature (CCT). LEDs in streetlights should be diffused or recessed to reduce dazzle.

Jeff Shaw, President-elect of the Society of Light and Lighting, said:

“This report is a valuable collection of data that will be extremely useful in enabling both the public and private sector to make informed choices when looking to procure LED lighting solutions and promote energy efficiency.

 “LED technology has advanced enormously in the last decade, but there are still a lot of things to consider when deciding which solution is best for you, and how to deliver it. What this report highlights is the need to consult a properly trained and qualified designer or engineer using the latest guidance to get the most out of an LED solution, and to ensure it is the best choice for people and the environment.”

To view the report ‘Human Responses to Lighting Based on LED Lighting Solutions (Public Health England)’ please click here

Register to attend Facilities Show

Be part of the largest gathering of facilities managers in the world. Gain CPD points and learn from industry experts at over 80 complimentary seminar sessions when you visit Facilities Show on 21 – 23 June at ExCeL, London. Theatres include; FM in the Real World theatre, Facilities 2020 Strategy Summit, FM Operational Excellence Arena and the BIFM Careers Zone. Plus, meet with over 300 forward-thinking suppliers covering: maintenance, mechanical and electrical, cleaning, CAFM, catering and more.

Register to attend today

About Sarah OBeirne

Avatar

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*