
 
		FMJ.CO.UK MAINTENANCE       FOCUS 
 MAY 2020    35 
 He suggests that in premises with no  
 occupants, the SFG30 Mothballing and  
 Reactivation (a subset of SFG20) can  
 be used by FMs as a starting point to  
 determine best practice for shutdown  
 procedures and eventual reactivation  
 of buildings (2), bearing in mind each  
 organisation will have its own unique  
 set-up and operations. “This helps  
 those working with a reduced team,  
 particularly by reducing the need to be  
 on site,” he says. “By decommissioning  
 redundant assets, teams can focus on the  
 most important tasks and benefit from  
 cost and energy e iciencies during this  
 downtime.”  
 Many factors will need to be considered.  
 “Leaving water systems dormant, for  
 example, could result in unsanitary  
 conditions and bacteria. This could lead to  
 a dangerous build-up of legionella, putting  
 employees in danger and leading to costly  
 remedial action. Regular flushing and  
 legionella testing will keep things running  
 smoothly and safely.  
 “Using CAFM/BMS ensures that, when  
 restrictions are li ed and people return to  
 their o ice spaces, the predicted changes  
 to industry maintenance recommendations  
 and standards are easily adopted and  
 mobilised.” 
 Bullard notes that while BMS integration  
 isn’t a new technology, until recently the  
 data produced has tended to be used on a  
 reactive basis. For example, a sensor picks  
 up that something isn’t right and creates  
 an alarm, which triggers the CAFM/IWMS  
 system into sending an engineer to resolve  
 the fault.  
 “In these times of reduced occupancy  
 and mothballed assets, where runtime  
 maintenance could prove a more e ective  
 strategy, there is a real opportunity to  
 explore how information from the BMS  
 can influence maintenance regimes. The  
 increase in automation will also serve to  
 minimise physical contact with customers.  
 BMS integration with CAFM/IWMS systems  
 is becoming a practical, even standard way  
 of working with the potential to positively  
 transform FM operations.”  
 He concludes: “While technology  
 and artificial intelligence can never  
 replace the human element, they can  
 help facilities managers to work more  
 e ectively. Enabling buildings to ‘talk’ to  
 you and provide accurate data, instead of  
 carrying out lengthy manual investigative  
 processes, makes operational tasks more  
 manageable and intuitive, not just during  
 this crisis but for the long-term future.  
 Indeed, the current situation could prove to  
 be a catalyst in changing attitudes towards  
 adopting new technology, particularly in  
 regard to CAFM/BMS.” 
 TO CLOSE OR NOT TO CLOSE 
 Arty Shaw, Director of Engineering for FM  
 provider the Salisbury Group, agrees that  
 connected so ware tools are important  
 in providing an intelligent solution to  
 building requirements. He says: “We’ve  
 already found that for some buildings  
 clients think they’ve shut all their systems  
 down, but using remote monitoring, they  
 find that the kit is still on timers, and it’s  
 kicking in and using a considerable  
 amount of energy.  
 “This is why remote  
 monitoring is critical  
 in this pandemic. If  
 companies have  
 those sorts of  
 sensors fitted,  
 and it’s being  
 monitored with a  
 proper dashboard,  
 you can look at live  
 trends that show  
 which kit is still on,  
 what could be turned  
 o , turned down or  
 programmed to come on  
 periodically.” 
 One of the most di icult decisions  
 facing organisations is whether or not to  
 shut buildings down completely during  
 the lockdown. Shaw believes total closure  
 could be a mistake. “At Salisbury we use  
 the analogy of a building being viewed  
 as a human body. BMS is the brain, HVAC  
 is the heart and lungs, electricity is the  
 nervous system and water is the plasma/ 
 lymphatic system. As such, we consider  
 ‘palliative care’ for a building to be an  
 essential strategy rather than shutting  
 down systems and allowing them to decay.  
 Little and o en is better than nothing at  
 all.” 
 He argues that the level of work required  
 to recommission a building for occupancy  
 will be predicated on the amount (and  
 type) of maintenance that is carried out  
 while it is unoccupied. “For instance,  
 ensuring that a HVAC system operates at  
 its minimum running parameters and  
 continues to both push fluid around  
 the pipework and provide positive  
 pressure will safeguard the  
 system from corrosion and  
 sludge build-up. Our strategy  
 is to engage with the client  
 and determine the level of  
 occupancy, the period of  
 reduced occupancy and  
 the business criticality of  
 the building. This will then  
 influence and inform the  
 regime we will promote to  
 them.” 
 The biggest issue is water  
 One of the most diffi  cult  
 decisions facing organisations is  
 buildings down completely during  
 the lockdown. Shaw believes  
 systems. He explains: “If you simply  
 whether or not to shut  
 turn them o  and let them stay stagnant  
 you are wandering into a whole world  
 of pain when it comes to flushing out  
 and recommissioning. This is why we’ve  
 stepped up our testing regime for this, to  
 ensure that the systems will be ready to use  
 in 24 rather than 48 hours, once buildings  
 are reopened.” 
 He adds that once a building is at low  
 or zero occupancy, it is more important  
 total closure could be  
 a mistake.”