FOCUS      FIRE SAFETY 
 EMERGENCY  
 ANNOUNCEMENT 
 Facilities managers are responsible for fire  
 safety and emergency planning. As such they  
 must anticipate and plan for a possible large-scale  
 evacuation. Some kind of audible warning system  
 is essential – but many buildings have di erent  
 kinds of alarms, which can create confusion.  
 How are people to distinguish the fire alarm from  
 emergency exit alarms, intrusion alarms and  
 public safety alerts? And how are safety messages  
 to be conveyed promptly and clearly amid the  
 cacophony of sound? 
 When hundreds of people have to be evacuated from  
 a building or retail site in a hurry, the clarity of public  
 address announcements is a safety-critical concern.  
 One solution is to install a voice alarm (VA) system. The  
 concept of voice commands is increasingly recognised  
 as an e icient and sensible way to instruct and direct  
 people on how to leave a building or other area during  
 an emergency. 
 There is well documented research into people’s  
 behaviour in the event of a fire. One notable finding is  
 the variation in speed of response to di erent types of  
 alarm signal (see box, reference note 1): 
 48    JUNE 2019 
  13 per cent of people react in a timely manner  
 to bells  
  45 per cent of people react to text information  
  75 per cent of people react in a timely manner  
 to voice messages.  
 Further research shows that people’s behaviour varies  
 according to the environment, and in an emergency  
 they may attempt to exit the building using the same  
 door they used to enter (2). A clear voice message  
 greatly increases the response rate and provides  
 the opportunity to advise occupants of the safest  
 emergency route. 
 Voice sounders are a good example of how voice  
 technology can reduce delays and increase response  
 during an evacuation, either used as a single-message  
 24V conventional voice sounder on a sounder/ 
 notification alarm circuit or as part of a sophisticated,  
 multi-message, multilingual evacuation system. 
 The trend towards integrating voice sounders into  
 automated fire systems is growing. With multiple  
 sounder circuit synchronisation and the ability to  
 pre-record several messages, voice sounders can  
 be incorporated into both new and existing alarm  
 systems. They can be used as a drop-in replacement  
 for basic tone sounders or as part of a sophisticated  
 engineered solution.  
 Multi-message versions of Vimpex’s Fire-Cryer, for  
 example, have been used in shopping malls like the  
 Arndale centres and Gunwharf Quays, museums  
 including Liverpool Maritime Museum, areas of mass  
 transit such as the London Underground, schools (for  
 fire, lock down and class change), and a ra  of mixeduse  
 residential, retail and commercial spaces. Voice  
 sounders can be supplied with foreign language and  
 bespoke messages where required. Use of a high-quality  
 rocking armature capsule technology ensures the  
 broadcast of clear, audible, unambiguous messages. 
 When designing a new fire alarm system, the first  
 task is to agree the evacuation strategy and whether  
 there is any requirement for a staged or phased  
 evacuation. The alarm tones and recorded messages  
 must be agreed with the client; with up to seven  
 messages available in a single sounder, a fire alarm  
 system can be expanded to include inputs for bomb  
 alerts, terrorist threats, coded warnings, water leakage  
 alerts, class change announcements, system tests, ‘all  
 clear’ notifications, machinery shutdown warnings,  
 health and safety reminders, general alert messages,  
 and, of course, warnings of fire. The potential is huge.  
 Voice sounders provide clear and  
 unambiguous messages in the  
 eYent oI a fi Ue oU otKeU ePeUJency  
 and aUe an eƚectiYe tecKnoloJy IoU  
 public and commercial buildings 
 REFERENCE NOTES 
 (1) ‘Misconceptions about human behaviour in fire  
 emergencies’, by Guylc ne Proulx PhD. Published in Canadian  
 Consulting Engineer, 1997. Also Studies of Human Behaviour  
 in Fire: Empirical results and their implications for education  
 and design, by David Cantor. Published by BRE, July 1985. 
 (2) University of Greenwich. Studies have shown that  
 occupants tend to use familiar routes – typically using the  
 exit through which they entered the building. Research  
 conducted by the University of Greenwich, which has  
 undertaken a study called Human Behaviour in Fire  
 Networks (HUBFIN), discovered that only 38 per cent of  
 people see passive signage in an emergency.  
 https://www.risk-uk.com/building-evacuation-let-yourvoice 
 be-heard/ 
 (3) CNN. From voice-mail systems to GPS devices to Siri and  
 beyond, why are so many computerised voices female? One  
 answer may lie in biology. Scientific studies have shown  
 that people generally find women’s voices more pleasing  
 than men’s.  
 https://edition.cnn.com/2011/10/21/tech/innovation/ 
 female-computer-voices/index.html 
 (4) CCN (above). When it comes to consumer applications  
 of computerised voices, the sex of the voice is usually  
 determined by what service or product is employing it. For  
 example, transit systems such as the San Francisco Area’s  
 BART Bay Area Rapid Transit o en use higher-pitched  
 voices because they are easier to hear over the clatter of  
 the train cars.  
 Look who’s talking... 
 Behavioural science studies reveal that the  
 persuasive power of a voiced announcement is  
 reliant on the vocal characteristics and perceived  
 credibility of the speaker (3). And for most people,  
 that means female. Think of virtual assistants Siri  
 and Alexa, and most satnavs (the default voice for  
 GPS navigation systems tends to be female). Alpha  
 male tends not to be a popular choice compared to a  
 steady, calm female voice. Similarly, for emergency  
 alert systems it’s been shown (4) that women’s  
 voices are more persuasive, particularly when the  
 announcement concerns a nongender  
 issue. 
 James Jones, Managing Director of Vimpex, a  
 manufacturer and distributor of fire detection, alarm  
 and evacuation products and accessories, is familiar  
 with the analytics behind the issue of voice-based alerts  
 to convey authority. “It’s commonly accepted that the  
 female voice is more appropriate for the vast majority  
 of applications, and in fact the female voice ‘carries’  
 somewhat better in many environments,” he says.  
 “That’s why women’s voices in seven languages are  
 available with our products.”  
 When Vimpex developed its Fire-Cryer voice sounder  
 ranges, it looked at the di erence between male and  
 female voices and measured such aspects as instinctive  
 reaction and empathetic acceptance. 
 “Another important aspect is the behaviour of the  
 female voice when used in sounder technology,” Jones  
 continues. “The female voice is ‘purer’ in that it actually  
 has a narrower frequency range at the same sound  
 pressure level (SPL) than the male equivalent. This  
 means that it is much more easily reproduced through  
 the Fire-Cryer sounder and, for any given sound level,  
 requires less current than a male voice.”  
 He adds that even in products supplied to  
 national regions that are arguably more traditional  
 and patriarchal, the female voice has been deemed  
 appropriate.  
 
				
/
		/index.html